返回技能包商店
查看全部





支持平台
Claude CodeCodex
安全等级
低风险
安装难度
新手友好最后验证
2026年7月2日01/功能概览
功能概览
交付前系统化验证:不声称完成,直到测试、构建、类型检查等验收项全部通过。
- AI 说做完了,其实代码跑不通
- 改了一处没回归验证,破坏了别处
- 没跑构建就交付,上线才发现报错
- 类型错误没检查就声称完成
02/使用场景
使用场景
- 功能开发完先验证再交付
- 重构后做回归验证
- 改 bug 后确认没有引入新问题
- 确保构建和测试通过再报告完成
03/适合人群
适合谁用
- 被「AI 说做完了其实没好」坑过的人
- 需要交付前验收的团队
- 追求交付质量的开发者
04/不适合人群
不适合谁
- 探索性原型阶段
- 不需要验证的一次性草稿
普通人版解释
用大白话说这个技能包解决「AI 说做完了其实没跑通」的问题。普通 AI 写完代码就急着说「完成了」,但你一跑就报错。装了这个技能包后,AI 会在说完成之前先跑测试、构建、类型检查,全部通过才会报告完成。这样交付的质量更有保证。
专业版解释
给 Claude Code / Codex 用户Verification Before Completion Skill 要求 AI 在声称任务完成之前,先做系统化验证。安装后,AI 不会在写完代码就急着说「完成了」,而是先跑测试、构建、类型检查、回归验证等验收项,全部通过后才报告完成。它明确禁止「未验证就声称成功」,避免「AI 说做完了其实没跑通」的问题。
07/安装方式
安装方式
复制对应平台的命令到终端执行。安装前建议先确认来源和安全等级。
安装命令
/plugin install superpowers@claude-plugins-official
08/SKILL.md 预览
SKILL.md 预览
这是这个技能包的核心内容。默认折叠预览,确认后再复制或展开。
SKILL.md 预览
# Verification Before Completion
## Overview
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.
**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**
## The Iron Law
```
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
```
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
## The Gate Function
```
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
```
## Common Failures
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|-------|----------|----------------|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
## Red Flags - STOP
- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- Thinking "just this once"
- Tired and wanting work over
- **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**
## Rationalization Prevention
| Excuse | Reality |
|--------|---------|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
## Key Patterns
**Tests:**
```
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
```
**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**
```
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
```
**Build:**
```
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
```
**Requirements:**
```
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
```
**Agent delegation:**
```
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report
```
## Why This Matters
From 24 failure memories:
- your human partner said "I don't believe you" - trust broken
- Undefined functions shipped - would crash
- Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features
- Time wasted on false completion → redirect → rework
- Violates: "Honesty is a core value. If you lie, you'll be replaced."
## When To Apply
**ALWAYS before:**
- ANY variation of success/completion claims
- ANY expression of satisfaction
- ANY positive statement about work state
- Committing, PR creation, task completion
- Moving to next task
- Delegating to agents
**Rule applies to:**
- Exact phrases
- Paraphrases and synonyms
- Implications of success
- ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness
## The Bottom Line
**No shortcuts for verification.**
Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.
This is non-negotiable.09/使用示例
如何使用
安装后,把下面的提示词直接发给 AI 即可触发这个技能包。
使用示例(直接发给 AI)
- 1.请使用完成前验证技能包,在交付前帮我跑一遍测试和构建。
- 2.请使用完成前验证技能包,验证这个改动没有破坏其他功能。
- 3.请使用完成前验证技能包,确认所有验收项通过后再说完成。
10/安全说明
安全说明
技能包可能不只是提示词。请先查看下面的权限表,了解这个技能包会做什么。
| 权限项 | 状态 | 风险 |
|---|---|---|
| 是否包含脚本 | 否 | 无风险 |
| 是否会执行系统命令 | 否 | 无风险 |
| 是否会读取本地文件 | 否 | 无风险 |
| 是否会联网请求 | 否 | 无风险 |
| 是否适合新手安装 | 是 | 适合新手 |
低风险
可以放心安装使用,适合所有用户。11/相关技能包
相关技能包

测试驱动开发技能包
铁律:先写测试、看它失败、再写最少代码让它通过。任何功能或 bug 修复前使用。

React 动画技能包
让 AI 在 React / Next.js 里正确使用 GSAP:useGSAP hook、清理、SSR 不报错。

Skill 调用规范技能包
让 AI 在回答前主动检查并调用相关 Skill,是 Superpowers 技能集的入口。

系统化调试技能包
遇到任何 bug、测试失败、异常行为时,先找根因再修复,禁止瞎猜式打补丁。

创意发散技能包
帮你快速生成选题、产品点子、文案方向、活动玩法,适合做内容、策划和创业想法发散。

方案撰写技能包
把任务拆成清晰可执行的计划:明确步骤、依赖、验收标准,再开始实现。